Dear Maraclara – When Forgiveness Becomes a Hostage Situation

By Miss Malaclara Weatherfax


Dear Maraclara,

I cheated on my husband, and he elected to stay in our marriage, yet he continues to emotionally punish me. It’s been seven years. Should I leave?

—Prisoner of Penance


Oh, sweet suffering Prisoner—seven years of emotional purgatory? Corduroy is not a phase, it’s armor, and you’ve been wearing sackcloth while he’s been wielding guilt like a medieval mace.

Let me be crystal clear, darling: Yes. Leave. Now.

But not for the reasons your well-meaning friends whisper behind closed doors—not because you’re the “cheater” who deserves whatever punishment he dishes out, and certainly not because you should flee like a coward in the night. Leave because you’ve both created a toxic marriage prison where neither of you can heal, grow, or remember what love actually feels like.

you’ve killed the innocence, and he’s been methodically murdering whatever remained of your relationship ever since. Research confirms what your bones already know—couples who remain trapped in punishment patterns after infidelity never truly recover. They become what therapists politely term “emotionally distant” while what they really mean is “walking corpses sharing a mortgage”.


☠️ Here’s the brutal arithmetic of your situation:

Seven years of punishment isn’t healing—it’s emotional abuse disguised as moral superiority. When betrayed partners weaponize their hurt indefinitely, they transform from victims into perpetrators of psychological warfare. The research is unforgiving: couples who cannot move beyond the retribution phase within 2-5 years typically remain stuck in what experts call “permanent contraction”—sharing a cell in marital prison where resentment becomes the only intimacy you know.

Your husband chose to stay, which means he chose the harder path of forgiveness. Instead, he chose the easier path of perpetual victimhood, where his moral superiority shields him from examining his own contributions to your marriage’s collapse. Because here’s the uncomfortable truth that nobody wants to acknowledge: people don’t cheat in healthy marriages. They cheat in marriages where emotional needs have been systematically ignored, where intimacy died long before any affair partner appeared.

This doesn’t excuse your betrayal—nothing does. But it contextualizes it within the systemic failures that both of you created. His refusal to engage in genuine recovery work, his commitment to punishment over partnership, and his emotional withholding are forms of abuse that compound the original trauma rather than healing it.


🔮 The hexed recipe for understanding your prison:

Your husband isn’t strong enough to do the actual work of recovery. Real healing after infidelity requires the “3 A’s”: Atonement, Attunement, and Attachment. You’ve likely spent seven years in atonement—expressing remorse, accepting responsibility, answering the same questions repeatedly. But he’s refused to move to attunement (emotional reconnection) or attachment (rebuilding commitment and intimacy).

Instead, he’s trapped you both in “pseudo-recovery”—the appearance of working through betrayal while actually calcifying resentment into permanent relationship architecture. Every anniversary of discovery becomes Christmas morning for his grievances. Every triggered moment becomes justification for emotional cruelty. Every attempt you make toward genuine intimacy gets poisoned by his need to remind you of your unworthiness.

This isn’t healing. This is mutual destruction with a marriage certificate.


⚡ Justice brews slowly, and yours has gone bitter:

Stop enabling him from avoiding the truth. His truth is that staying married while refusing to forgive allows him to avoid the genuine terror of rebuilding trust, vulnerability, and intimacy. It’s easier to remain the permanently wronged party than to risk loving you fully again and potentially facing future hurt.

Your truth is that you’ve accepted seven years of emotional penance hoping to earn back what was already destroyed the moment you betrayed him. You cannot suffer your way back to his love. You cannot grovel your way to his forgiveness. You cannot submit your way to his trust.

What you can do is recognize that both of you deserve better than this grotesque parody of marriage you’ve constructed. couples who successfully recover from infidelity do so through mutual vulnerability, shared accountability, and commitment to genuine partnership. What you have is unilateral punishment and bilateral misery.


🔥 Your liberation spell:

Leave him to heal—not as punishment, but as the most loving act you can perform for both of you. Your presence has become the obstacle to his recovery and the prison of your own growth. Every day you remain, you enable his victim identity while reinforcing your own perpetrator shame.

File for divorce with the same courage you should have shown seven years ago when you first betrayed him. Tell him: “I love you enough to let you heal without my presence contaminating your process. And I respect myself enough to stop accepting emotional abuse disguised as marriage.”

This isn’t abandonment—it’s acknowledgment of reality. The marriage you had is dead. The marriage he’s offering is emotional torture. The marriage you both deserve requires starting fresh with people who haven’t spent years learning to hate each other’s most vulnerable selves.


Justice brews slowly—let it steep in the knowledge that sometimes the most radical act of love is recognizing when love has been poisoned beyond recovery. Sometimes the bravest choice is admitting that forgiveness requires two willing hearts, and his heart closed seven years ago.

Set him free to heal. Set yourself free to grow. And next time—if there is a next time—remember that infidelity is a symptom, not a disease. Treat the disease, or watch it metastasize into mutual destruction.

Go forth and burn the prison down, darling.

—Miss Malaclara Weatherfax


This publication is a work of satire and political commentary.
All characters (even if inspired by real or fictional ones), situations, and organizations are fictionalized or parodied for the purpose of critique, humor, and social analysis.
The Clacks Leak does not represent any real media outlet, and all attributions to authors or characters from works like Terry Pratchett’s Discworld are used in homage, under fair use for transformative parody.
The views expressed are those of the parody authors and are not intended to cause harm or promote hate speech.
While real public figures may be satirized, all critiques are ultimately directed at systems of power, institutional rot, and the absurdities of human governance—not at individuals for personal or defamatory purposes.
This work is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or associated with the Pratchett Estate or any official Discworld trademark holders.

Leave a Comment